Representative Leonard Lance (R-NJ 7th)
5th-term Republican from New Jersey.
Photo: Representative Lance
Bio & Contact Info
Send Message
Key Bills & Votes
Letters To Leaders
· More Letters to
  Rep. Lance

· Search All
  Letters

Letters To Leaders
All messages are published with permission of the sender. The general topic of this message is Agriculture/Food:
Subject:
Contact Your Federal Officials

To:
Rep. Leonard Lance
Sen. Robert Menendez

March 13, 2013

 I am writing to urge you to strike the “farmer assurance provision”, Section 735, currently included in the Senate Continuing Resolution spending bill being considered by Congress. While this currently is a Senate issue, the sentiment is valid for all fed officials to take note.

Though wrapped in a “farmer-friendly” package, this provision is simply an industry ploy to continue to sell genetically engineered (GE) seeds even when a court of law has found they were approved by USDA illegally. It is unnecessary and an unprecedented attack on U.S. judicial review. Congress should not be meddling with the judicial review process based solely on the special interest of a handful of companies.

The judicial review process is an essential element of U.S law and serves as a vital check on any Federal Agency decision that may negatively impact human health, the environment or livelihoods. Yet this provision seeks an end-run around such judicial review by preemptively deciding that industry can set its own conditions to continue to sell biotech seeds, even if a court may find them to have been wrongfully approved.

The provision further forces USDA to immediately approve any permits for continued planting the industry requests, putting industry completely in charge by allowing for a “back door approval” mechanism. USDA’s duty is to protect the interests of all farmers and the environment, a duty that would be eliminated by this provision.

The provision is also completely unnecessary. No farmer has ever had his or her crops destroyed. Every court to decide these issues has carefully weighed the interests of farmers, as is already required by law.
I urge you to demand that Appropriations Chairwoman Mikulski pull this dangerous and unconstitutional rider, and to support any amendment that would strike the rider from the Continuing Resolution.

Sincerely,

Flemington , NJ