|  |
|
All messages are published
with permission of the sender.
The general topic of this message is Health:
|
|
Subject:
Abortion Funding In the Bill- How Deciteful
To:
Sen. John McCain
Rep. Gabrielle Giffords
Sen. Jon Kyl
November 6, 2009
Hello Representitive Giffords
Taxpayer Funding for Abortion is Not In My interest, and I believe most Americans feel the same way, Why else is this SO HIDDEN and SO Disguised.
President Obama said in many many speaches, he does not support this.... However he and the Truth rarely collide in the same sentence.
I know you """say what you mean and Mean what you say"""""
Is there honor in the House and the Senate.
A Vote for the Pelosi Health Care Bill, whioch will not be posted to the Net, as Both She just four days ago and in many many Speeches and Our President Did as well, to show transperancy, Weel... they either Lied Then or are lieing Now.
You representive Giffords are a person of principal.
A Vote for health Care is a Vote for Abortion in the Health Care Bill.
Cathloic Bishops say, :: This is nothing More Than Government Funded Money Laundering to Fund Abortion.
I agree. What do you say, Representitive Giffords??
Please be aware of the following points on abortion funding in H.R. 3962. The abortion concerns are the best chance to defeat the "rule" (a procedural vote to proceed to debate) on Saturday:
•H.R. 3962 authorizes the "public option" to pay for all elective abortions
.
H.R. 3962 also creates a new national federal agency from which the "public option" will be administered. All federal agencies operate purely from federal funds because those are the only type of funds they can use, and the new Health Insurance Exchange will be no different. Once private dollars are transferred to the federal government or a federal agency in the form of a fine, a tax, or a paid premium, they are then no longer private funds - they become federal funds once the federal government assumes control of them.
•The Ellsworth Amendment is a phony "pro-life" amendment. Sponsored by so-called pro-life Democrat Rep. Brad Ellsworth (D-IN), this amendment, which is being discussed as a possible inclusion to the Democrats' grand Managers Amendment in an effort to appease some of the 40 pro-life Democrats who have vowed to vote NO on a bill that provides for abortion funding, will do nothing to prevent federal funds from going towards abortion coverage. All the Ellsworth Amendment will do is require the Health Insurance Exchange to hire contractors which will then pay the abortionists. So, instead of the abortionist receiving a check directly from the U.S. government, they will receive it from a contractor who is funneled money through the U.S. government.
•The real Pitts-Stupak pro-life amendment was rejected in committee and denied the chance to get a floor vote on Saturday. It is very important that you tell your Representatives (especially the 40 pro-life Democrats) that a vote for H.R. 3962 in its current form or even with the useless Ellsworth Amendment amounts to a vote for the largest expansion of abortion since Roe v. Wade (1973). Nothing less than an explicitly exclusion of federal funding for abortion and government subsidies for plans that cover abortion will be considered pro-life language.
Even worse, a sure sign that legislative language marketed to be "pro-life" is in fact not pro-life is when one of Congress' most stalwart abortion supporters has no problem with it:
"None of us really had any objections to the Ellsworth language. In fact, we think he did a good job."
-Pro-Choice Caucus co-chairwoman Louise Slaughter (D-NY), Congress Daily, 11/4/09
Many people often ask us why President Obama hasn't yet moved a major abortion bill through Congress-we say, the health care bill is his abortion bill!
VOTE AGAINST THE RULE to H.R. 3962 because the "rule" does not allow an up-or-down vote on the pro-life Pitts-Stupak amendment. A vote for the "rule" is a vote to allow federal funding for elective abortions on a massive scale for the very first time in American history.
We need our Representitives to stand up for there Constituents NOW.
Bradenton , AZ
|
Related Issue Alerts:
|
| |
