Subject:
Can the American Citizens that are blindly following the propaganda ever awakened and think for their selves? Do the Math already. Or do you beleive Al Gore really invented the Internet?
To:
Sen. Jim Webb
Rep. Gerry Connolly
Sen. Mark Warner
November 3, 2009
Can the American Citizens that are blindly following the propaganda ever awakened and think for their selves? Do the Math already. Or do you beleive Al Gore really invented the Internet?. Sense total human activities including breathing, fossil fuel, agriculture, deforestation only accounts for 5 percent of yearly CO2 output, and CO2is only 12 percent of greenhouse gasses then .05 times .12 equals .006 percent of greenhouse gasses. And greenhouse gases have a climate effect of .0001 in the climate equation using the ICCP own equations then .006 times .0001 equals .0000006 percent, or if all humans were eliminated and all their activities stopped the total effect on climate would be .6 millionth of 1 percent, or would have no effect what so ever. You want to listen to a bunch of Idiots politicians with a one world government agenda, Al Gore a C grade student in journalism talking about scientific and mathematical theories he has no knowledge of. The ICCP that was handpicked for their predisposed agenda, and funding and revenue interests in their climate studies, or use your own brain and common sense to learn the facts and truth for yourself. God when will these brain washed entitlement propagandized Americans start questioning where their free lunch is coming from and quit walking to the slaughter.
"NO Climate Change Treaty in Copenhagen!
To:
Sen. Mitch McConnell
October 30, 2009
Dear Senator McConnell,
Please vote against the dangerous Climate Change Treaty in Copenhagen. We are building global government based on an unproven science. Annex One countries such as America will once again be eroded with another tax as "redistribute" wealth to third world countries. . Please do not support this treaty
Michigan City , IN"
"Millennium Forum
Held at United Nations Headquarters from 22 to 26 May 2000
Governments:
1. To increase substantially the regular and peacekeeping budgets of the United Nations. The United Nations cannot carry out its many urgent tasks without substantially more resources and more staff. This budget could be doubled immediately, to very good effect. United Nations budget problems have had a serious negative effect on peacekeeping. In addition, the budgets of United Nations agencies should be increased to better support their work.
2. To pay United Nations dues on time, in full and without conditions. United Nations discussion of global taxes and fees have been stifled by the threat of a funding cut-off by a single Member State. This blackmail must be rejected, and the United Nations must vigorously explore the possibilities of alternate funding from such sources.
3. To move towards creation of alternative revenue sources for the United Nations. The United Nations should set up expert groups and begin the necessary intergovernmental negotiations towards establishing alternative revenue sources, which could include fees for the commercial use of the oceans, fees for airplane use of the skies, fees for use of the electromagnetic spectrum, fees on foreign exchange transactions (i.e., the Tobin Tax) and a tax on the carbon content of fuels. "
Go read it for yourself if you can handle the truth.
http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration...
"Waxman-Markey bill (Cap and Trade)
To:
Rep. Nancy Pelosi
October 19, 2009
Dear Speaker Pelosi,
Range magazine is a magazine about country issues published in Carson City, NV. I hope you are familiar with it. Below is an excerpt from an article by Michael Coffman, Ph.D., in the Fall 2009 issue. After reading this excerpt, I hope you will read the entire article and vote against the Waxman-Markey bill.
"Despite the many and expensive concerns of using alternative energy sources such as wind and solar, President Obama says we should follow the example of Spain, which is now producing nearly 20 percent of its energy needs from renewables. During his campaign, Obama claimed that he would create 5 million new, green jobs in our transition to renewable energy.
A study by King Juan Carlos University in Spain found that 2.2 jobs were destroyed in other areas of the economy for every green job created by government decree. Further, it cost $754,000 for every green job created. Applying simple math, Obama's five million new green jobs will only come at a cost of 11 million existing jobs. Worse, 90 percent of those green jobs are construction jobs that will be lost once the infrastructure nears completion. The study concluded that Spain's renewable policies were "terribly economically counterproductive." The authors warn the United States that "the Spanish/EU-style 'green jobs' agenda now being promoted in the United States in fact destroys job."
Wind and solar can certainly play a niche role in America's energy supply, and may eventually play a significant role if the technology is developed to mitigate most of its seemingly endless limitations. But as Vaclav Klaus, president of the EU and the Czech Republic, warns, "These technologies have not yet been invented…There is no known and economically feasible method or technology by which industrial economies can survive on expensive, unreliable, clean, green, renewable energy." (Excerpts from Vaclav Klaus' speech to the International Conference on Climate Change in New York City, March 2009)
Implementation of the Waxman-Markey bill would seriously harm the economy of the United States, cause the unemployment of 6 million people, and substantially reduce every family's standard of living. (emphasis added)
Perhaps this wrenching transformation of our society would be justified if the doom-and-gloom forecasts of catastrophic consequences of man-caused global warming were correct. However, readers of RANGE (magazine) know that more than 32,000 scientists in the United States alone are now saying there is no convincing scientific evidence that man is causing global warming. Thousands of leading scientists around the world have radically changed their minds because emerging science is increasingly negating the man-caused theory."
The above text is copied from "Cap and Trade Looms Large" by Michael Coffman, Ph.D., RANGE magazine, Fall 2009.
Reno , NV"
Clifton , VA
|
