Subject:
I think it time to put some chlorine in the Congressional Gene Pool and get rid of the scum.
To:
Rep. Gerry Connolly
November 2, 2009
The Progressive Socialist Democrats are violating My and the Majority of Americans First Amendment Rights or our Civil Rights and their oath of office which is SOP for Democrats to lie and manipulate and try to discredit their adversaries through lies and fabrications of untrue facts. The whole reason for Marriage was for the protection of the family that the union between a man and woman that could produce offspring. There cannot be Offspring produced between a man and a man or between a woman and a woman, this is a biological fact. These people are not satisfied with domestic partner status that gives them every benefit that a marriage gives a man and woman, no they keep pressing their agenda against our religious beliefs and our Constitutional Rights. Maybe it time to define marriage in the US Constitution that it is only between a Man and a Woman, to get these handicapped Person off our backs, and I will say this to their faces as well, quit pushing as I am not backing up anymore. This is what {Progressive Socialist Democrats are all about special interest groups and undermining the Rights of the Majority of Americans and spreading immorality, such as present by that obese Representative Nader from New York. I think it time to put some chlorine in the Congressional Gene Pool and get rid of the scum.
"HR 3567 IH
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 3567
To repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and ensure respect for State regulation of marriage.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
September 15, 2009
Mr. NADLER of New York (for himself, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. POLIS of Colorado, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. ENGEL, Ms. KILROY, Ms. SPEIER, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. ISRAEL, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Ms. DEGETTE, Mr. STARK, Mr. WEXLER, Mr. WELCH, Ms. LINDA T. SANCHEZ of California, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. WEINER, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. OLVER, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. MARKEY of Massachusetts, Ms. NORTON, Mr. HODES, Mr. ACKERMAN, Ms. VELAZQUEZ, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. HONDA, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Ms. WATSON, Mrs. LOWEY, Ms. CLARKE, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Ms. EDWARDS of Maryland, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. HOLT, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. BECERRA, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. FILNER, Mr. WAXMAN, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. MURPHY of Connecticut, Mr. PASTOR of Arizona, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. SESTAK, Mr. BERMAN, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. ROTHMAN of New Jersey, Mr. KENNEDY, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Ms. PINGREE of Maine, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. TONKO, Ms. TSONGAS, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. MATSUI, Ms. HARMAN, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. TIERNEY, Mr. HIMES, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. DOYLE, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Mr. FARR, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. MAFFEI, Ms. DELAURO, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Ms. MCCOLLUM, and Mr. WU) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Respect for Marriage Act of 2009'.
SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SECTION ADDED TO TITLE 28, UNITED STATES CODE, BY SECTION 2 OF THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT.
Section 1738C of title 28, United States Code, is repealed, and the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 115 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to that section.
SEC. 3. MARRIAGE RECOGNITION.
Section 7 of title 1, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
`Sec. 7. Marriage
`(a) For the purposes of any Federal law in which marital status is a factor, an individual shall be considered married if that individual's marriage is valid in the State where the marriage was entered into or, in the case of a marriage entered into outside any State, if the marriage is valid in the place where entered into and the marriage could have been entered into in a State.
`(b) In this section, the term `State' means a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any other territory or possession of the United States.'."
Clifton , VA
|
